The mystery of Long Shaw

Over the last few weekends members of CAGG have been working with members of the West Essex Archaeological Group on a site called Long Shaw near Theydon Bois (pronounced “boys”, as I discovered).  The site is a scheduled ancient monument and Ralph Potter, a member of both WEAG and CAGG, obtained the necessary S42 licence and permission from the landowner to work on the site.

The site has an interesting back-story.  In 1940, a Hurricane crashed into the field and the pilot was killed.  There is some doubt as to the identity of the pilot, but it is probably John Benzie who was flying with Sir Douglas Bader’s 242 squadron.  There is an article about this story in After the Battle magazine (issue 147, pp. 50–5).  In 1976 a local enthusiast obtained permission from the landowner to try and excavate the crashed plane.  This attracted the attention of the local archaeologists from WEAG and the Passmore Edwards Museum. The farmer couldn’t remember the name of the person undertaking the excavation apart from the fact that “he came from Loughton and drove a Volkswagen Caravette”.  On the 24th October 1976 T.A Betts and F. Clark of WEAG walked the site and reported their findings to Miss Wilkinson.  The Passmore Edwards report form states that they found:

  • 8kg of tegulae and imbrices [i.e., Roman roof tiles]
  • EPRIA [pre-Roman Iron Age] pottery, including one rim
  • mesolithic prismatic core and five flakes
  • Typical R-B [Romano-British] material of local quartz-gritted fabric, mortaria fragments, fine orange wares, one rosette-stamped, two fragments of Niedermendig quern.

The fieldwalkers created a sketch plan of the site and noted one back-filled machine-cut trench. In February 1977 a letter was sent to the Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings recommending that the site, thought to be a Roman villa, should be scheduled.  This advice was taken and the site was scheduled effective from the 13th December 1977.  Despite the scheduling, the site was again excavated on September 12th 1981 in an attempt to recover definitive evidence as to the identity of the pilot.

The scheduling was amended in 1994, but I have no information as to the nature of that amendment.  Since then, the site has not been further investigated, until Ralph organised the latest round of fieldwork.

The surface of the field is still littered with masses of Roman roof tiles.

Roman tiles seen on the surface of the field during the survey.

Roman tiles seen on the surface of the field during the survey.

The site lies at the top of a small hill overlooking a valley with quite surprising views for a site in the middle of suburbia.

Ralph Potter (WEAG) using the magnetometer aided by Jim West (CVAHS).

Ralph Potter (WEAG) using the magnetometer aided by Jim West (CVAHS).

The other surprise is the occasional Central Line train passing by the site to the east!

The Central Line

The Central Line

Luckily we were far enough away for the results not to be affected.

On the last Friday of September we started the mag survey and managed seven grid squares during the day.  The next day I was delivering the key-note address at a conference in St Albans and left the mag survey to Ruth (WAS), Jim, Peter (WAS) and Ralph.  Unfortunately, the weather turned foul, but more worryingly, the mag’s intermittent fault with the odometer reappeared. On the Sunday, therefore, we completed six 20x20m grids of Earth Resistance survey. Yesterday, we returned to site with Mike Smith (Wheathampstead History Society) and completed another six resistance grids.  Meanwhile, the mag has been sent for repair.

The mag survey was not very exciting.  The red line in the image below represents the scheduled monument area.

The mag survey results.

The mag survey results.

There is a line of ferrous responses which show in this image as strong black and white spots running diagonally across the survey.  The explanation for these can be seen by looking at the 1945 historical imagery in Google Earth.

The 1945 historical imagery with the scheduled area marked by a red line, and the now-removed fence line marked in blue.

The 1945 historical imagery with the scheduled area marked by a red line, and the now-removed fence line marked in blue.

There is a hedge with trees running across the field in a similar position.  By marking this with a blue line, and then switching back to the standard view with the mag data we can see that they match pretty closely.

Mag results with the old hedge line superimposed.

Mag results with the old hedge line superimposed.

There are, however, a few other anomalies which may be archaeological features which I have marked on the following image.

The mag survey annotated.

The mag survey annotated.

One long linear anomaly (ditch?) and two smaller ones hardly make a villa, but we need to remember that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” and it may be that the features simply have no magnetic contrast.

We initially completed an area of 60x40m of earth resistance survey.  Although not a great deal showed, there were hints of something on the northern edge and so yesterday we surveyed a further 60x40m.

Alexandra Lyons of WEAG uses UCL's Geoscan RM85 Resistance Meter.

Alexandra Lyons of WEAG uses UCL’s Geoscan RM85 Resistance Meter.

We continued to use the pole-pole set-up (i.e., having the remote probes 20m away and with a 10m separation) and this nicely saved us from the pain of matching grids between the two days’ worth of survey.

The Earth Resistance survey results.

The Earth Resistance survey results.

The areas of high resistance, shown in black, are probably largely the result of geology.  The lighter, low resistance linear features across them, however, are very curious, especially the one that follows the line of the scheduled area.  Was this the trench dug in 1976? Or the 1981 trench which may have aimed to follow the edge of the scheduled area but be outside of it?  There is one thinner linear feature running SW-NE which might be something archaeological, and it was the bottom part of this that led to the second day’s worth of survey.  It is, however, a bit irregular and not all that convincing.

Here is a composite image showing how the various bits add together.

Mag and resistance surveys with the hedge line.

Mag and resistance surveys with the hedge line.

Peter Alley has been using his UAV to take high level aerial photographs.  Here is one example.

A high level aerial photograph of the site taken using a DJI Phantom quadcopter. (c) Peter Alley.

A high level aerial photograph of the site taken using a DJI Phantom quadcopter. (c) Peter Alley.

Various soil marks can be seen but nothing convincing as archaeological features.  Peter has also been using the images to create contour maps using “Structure from Motion” techniques.  For more on that, come to the Welwyn Archaeological Society’s members evening on the 11th November where Peter will be showing some initial results.

Looking at the historical imagery on Google Earth, one can almost convince oneself there is a rectangular feature showing in the 1999 image, especially if one turns up the contrast in Photoshop.  The only problem is that the southern edge matches the old hedge line.

The 1999 image from Google Earth with the contrast edited in Photoshop.

The 1999 image from Google Earth with the contrast edited in Photoshop.

This site remains a bit of a mystery.  There are large numbers of Roman tile fragments on the surface, but almost no pottery.  We only spotted one tiny sherd of Highgate Wood ware and one sherd of LPRIA grog-tempered pottery.  The mag and res results are not very exciting. Ralph’s GPR is equally unexciting although on these clay soils that is less surprising.  I am torn between extending the surveys in case the actual site lies just outside the area we have completed, and stopping here and concentrating on the many sites where we have had excellent results.  It is a shame that the mag is out of action as a minimum it would be useful to complete the scheduled area.  Ideally, WEAG should organise a pick-up survey so we could at least map where the finds are coming from.

 

Another day, another town

You would think I would have had enough. But no… hot on the heels of the end of the Gorhambury season, we headed off to the mysterious east side of the county. The Greenwich meridian seems to exert a powerful influence in Hertfordshire with its citizens seemingly afraid to cross the invisible line.

Back at the start of the project, we planned to do some survey in and around Braughing.  We managed just one site. The area is extremely important with multiple late Iron Age and Roman sites including the Roman “small town” on Wickham Hill.  We had an opportunity to work on the small town along with members of the Braughing Archaeological Group for a couple of days, mainly to see if magnetometry would show something useful.  The field was, however, rather rough and caused the odometer on the cart to over-run by about a meter, and the nuts and bolts needed constant tightening. On the second day I adjusted the odometer settings which improved matters a bit.

The survey underway on Wickham Hi

The survey underway on Wickham Hill.

We managed to complete 13 grid squares which was pretty good going, especially as the data logger crashed three lines before the end of the fourteenth square and we lost the rest of the grid.  The results, after a bit of work in TerraSurveyor, were very interesting.

The survey results.

The survey results.

The broad line running east-west towards the south of the surveyed area is the road.  It can be seen in the Google Earth image in the background.  Towards the west, the very dark band must be where the road becomes a sunken way as it goes up the slope.  What is very obvious is the difference to the planned public town at Verulamium.  This site was clearly a very different type of settlement.  What we have clearly shown is that it is worth expanding the magnetometry survey to cover as much of the settlement as possible.  Hopefully, the field surface will be a little more benign when we return!  One thing won’t change, however, and that is the slope…

On top of the hill.

On top of the hill.

Many thanks to Jim West for coming all the way from Chorley Wood to run the mag on the first day while I lay-in the grid, and also many thanks to all the members of BAG who joined in. Looks like we’ll be back!

A picture is worth a 1000 words

The Verulamium magnetometry survey.

The Verulamium magnetometry survey.

I suppose I cannot really get away with that simple a post.

First of all, CONGRATULATIONS to everyone, it is a fantastic achievement and I am so proud of all of you.  Secondly, a big thanks to everyone who turned out for an extra day on Bank Holiday Monday to complete the Macellum field.

How about some numbers?  Well, Verulamium is the third biggest Roman town in Britain, after London and Cirencester.  It is, however, the largest Roman town in Britain which doesn’t have a modern settlement built over most of it.  We have surveyed 64.5ha of the total area of 81ha.  It has taken us 83 working days starting in the summer of 2013, but we didn’t do much at Verulamium in 2014.  It took 12,900,400 readings to cover those 64.5 ha.   That, of course, doesn’t include the grids we did twice because of frozen sensors or other problems. People pushing the cart walked about 322km, not including having to go back to the start for partials, getting to the squares in the first place, or laying in the tapes and strings.

Let us look in more detail at the last bit surveyed in the Macellum Field.

The area surveyed during day 37) high contrast).

The area surveyed during day 37) high contrast).

Several things come to mind.  Firstly, there is very little there!  Towards the NE and along the western side there may be a ditch feature, although it is quite faint.  Other than that, the main (and annoying) thing are the strong magnetic anomalies along the edge of the field.  Some of you may remember the 12″ gas main which runs across the Park… well here it is again.  What I do not entirely understand why there are differences between the negative and positive readings along our grid lines.  Jim and I spent some time making sure I put the composite together correctly, and we are sure it isn’t a survey error.

This end of the field is know to contain two Romano-Celtic temples.  These are known from aerial photographs taken in the hot summer of 1976.  I wonder if this area of the town was kept clear of encroaching buildings, pits, ditches and the like deliberately?  If we turn the contrast down (i.e., clip the image at +/- 40nT instead of +/- 7.5nT, we can see one of the temples close to the hedge as a faint white line.

Low contrast version of the area surveyed on day 37.

Low contrast version of the area surveyed on day 37.

Yet another target for the GPR next year!

Some of the team (many thanks Ellen, Mike and Jim!) helped re-do a number of areas of the res survey, plus one extra bonus square.  The biblical deluge of Sunday night (Lamer Lane was flooded once more) was not ideal.  This is the final area completed in 2016:

The 2016 resistance survey.

The 2016 resistance survey.

It is a pretty good result.  There is almost no use of the “edge match” feature of the software to get the various grids to join neatly.  It could be improved.  The very high contrast of the temple rather makes the buildings faint, but either the creation of selective composites (i.e., processing bit of the survey separately), or use of a high pass filter, would improve that.  The survey is quite big for a res survey: 2.5739ha according to TS (or 2.6ha to sane people who round numbers), which equals about 103,000 resistance readings.  That, of course, doesn’t include the large numbers of squares we re-did due to the dry conditions.

There is a great deal more to do in terms of data processing and interpretation, but I think we all deserve a well-earned rest.  Well, at least until Thursday…!

Rain didn’t stop play

… but may be it should have done!  Last year, on the last day of the survey, it poured and we cancelled.  Today, we thought “it is only a little drizzle!”  On occasions, drizzle was more of a deluge.  At one point I was about as far from the cars as it is possible to get when on site, and I got soaked.  Thankfully, Ellen went and fetched a dry tee-shirt and my waterproof coat.  Thank you Ellen, you’re a star!

Peter, one of our volunteers from SWHAS and WAS, has bought himself a UAV fitted with a camera.  He has been having some practice flights over the workers and the site.  When I have worked out how to edit the video down to a sane size, I’ll post one of those, but meanwhile here is one of the stills.  The UAV will prove a very useful tool.

Verulamium Theatre.

Verulamium Theatre.

One of the main reasons we persisted in the rain was the fact that we are so very close to completing the mag survey of the Macellum field.

The magnetometer survey of the Macellum field.

The magnetometer survey of the Macellum field.

Here is a closer detail of today’s survey.

The mag survey after day 36.

The mag survey after day 36.

As can be seen, Watling Street has rejoined the drive.  There appear to be many buildings opposite the theatre which isn’t a surprise in the heart of the town.  Street 24, which runs NNE from the theatre, has the macellum on the east side of it.  This building has been partially excavated and has a complex building history of five phases going from the mid-first century to the early fourth.  It has an almost equally complex excavation history: it has been examined by Grove Lowe (1847), John Harris (1869), Kathleen Kenyon (1934) and finally by Miss K. M. Richardson in 1938.

The resistance survey continued.  The wet surface was both a boon and a problem.  The first two grid squares went very smoothly.  Then we moved all the probes and so forth and the machine started to play-up.  After lunch, Peter came to the rescue and worked out that there was water where it oughtn’t to be, cleaned and dried connections and so forth, and all was well again.  We managed another three grids including one in 35 minutes.  Here is the survey.

The res survey after day 36.

The res survey after day 36.

The same area as the previous image showing the mag data.

The same area as the previous image showing the mag data.

In the first of the two images, I have not “edge matched” the grids so that you can see the ones which are a problem.  Three of the grids we did today fixed existing problems.  Although we had not planned to work tomorrow, I am hoping we might manage five more squares to fix the problems and give us a nice tidy survey.  Archaeological geophysicists are obsessed by “nice tidy surveys.”

Comparing the mag and the resistance surveys, the end of the “sinuous ditch”, seen snaking in from the top of the mag survey, can be seen in the resistance survey but it seems to continue further to the east.  The clear building on the northern edge of the resistance plot also shows pretty well in the mag survey.

Lastly, we learnt one lesson today.  The GPR doesn’t work well in the rain!  We surveyed a block near the rectangular enclosure I thought might be a temple.  Here is the mag:

Rectangular enclosure, near the southern side of the town, seen in the mag data.

Rectangular enclosure, near the southern side of the town, seen in the mag data.

Speculation has been rife as to what this may be, so we tried using the GPR.

Day 36 GPR data.

Day 36 GPR data.

The terrible striping is caused by the rain.  We will have to re-do this block another year.  We can see, however, a square in the centre of the block, and almost another square around it. Before we get too excited, however, comparison of the two surveys shows that the squares in the GPR data lie outside the NNE edge of the enclosure, and in fact, partly show as light white lines in the mag data.  Yet another question to be investigated more fully next year.

Many thanks to everyone who suffered the rain today.  You are all stars.

Tomorrow will be our last day.  I won’t post the results until Tuesday, however, as we are going for a celebration meal in a local pub.

Three day catch-up

I haven’t managed a Verulamium post for a few days so here is a quick catch-up.

Firstly, the mag has been slowly working its way eastwards along the Macellum Field.  They are getting pretty close to the end of it.

The mag survey in the Macellum field after day 35.

The mag survey in the Macellum field after day 35.

As can be seen, Watling Street stands out very clearly running from near the theatre to the Chester Gate.  There are lots of buildings along the road as would be expected.  Some are less clear than one would hope because they have been partially excavated.  The spec-ally look to the data, almost certainly because of the gravel subsoil, does make it harder to see what is going on here.  The carrot at the end of the stick — apart from just finishing the field of course — is that there are two Romano-Celtic temples known from aerial photographs near the modern road.

The next image is just to show how much of Verulamium we have now completed.  Poster, anyone?

The complete survey so far.

The complete survey so far.

The resistance survey has had a few problems.  The lack of rain has made the top-surface of the field very dry and hard.  It is very slow going, and the data is not as clean as one would like.  Despite the problems, however, some of the buildings along the road, especially at the north side of the plot, are very clear indeed.

The resistance survey after day 35.

The resistance survey after day 35.

Although it doesn’t jump out at one when just looking at the plot, the sinuous ditch does show in the resistance data when one knows where to look!

The GPR team completed some blocks along the hedgeline which I haven’t processed yet… sorry!  They also did one block up next to the Chester Gate to investigate the building here, and one over the sinuous ditch.  The latter did show the ditch but very little else.  Let’s look at the block near the Chester Gate.

The mag survey near the Chester Gate.

The mag survey near the Chester Gate.

This first image shows the mag data.  The building in the middle shows as white lines roughly parallel to the modern drive.  There are lots of other darker features, probably various pits and the sinuous ditch shows to the west.

Day 35 GPR, slice 2 (9.5 to 12.5ns).

Day 35 GPR, slice 2 (9.5 to 12.5ns).

This time slice shows the impact of splitting the survey over two days!  The left hand side was done yesterday afternoon, the right hand side this morning.  The pattern of the ploughing and the tractor’s turning circle in the corner of the field show clearly.  Luckily, the problem is much less acute at lower depths.

Day 35 GPR, slice 3 (12.5 to 15.5ns).

Day 35 GPR, slice 3 (12.5 to 15.5ns).

This time slice now shows the building beautifully.  What a wonky end wall on the north side! There is a long narrow range of rooms to the SW.

Day 35 GPR, slice 4 (15.5 to 18.5ns).

Day 35 GPR, slice 4 (15.5 to 18.5ns).

This time slice shows the SW line of rooms more clearly, although at the southern end they are been partly destroyed.  We can see, however, fainter traces of the walls on the NE, a corridor, perhaps?

Day 35 GPR, slice 5 (18.5 to 21.5ns).

Day 35 GPR, slice 5 (18.5 to 21.5ns).

This time slice does show the “corridor” to the NE much more clearly.  Perhaps it is more deeply buried in the plough bank?   For most of the plot, though, nothing much else is showing.

There has been a little rain this evening.  I have my fingers crossed for more.  Hopefully, tomorrow will be dry so that the mag can plough on eastwards!

As always, many thanks to everyone, especially those working with the res meter.  It is slow and boring at the best of times, but slow+annoying is a great deal to ask.

Lamer Park

This post is dedicated to the memory of David Gifford of Lamer (1942–2016).

Lamer lies a mile north of the village of Wheathampstead on the edge of the parish.  The name Lamer is first attested in 1396 in a document held by Westminster Abbey.  Westminster held the manor of Wheathampstead, a gift from Edward the Confessor in 1060.  The original deed is held in the Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies centre (HALS).  Lamer became a manor in its own right in the fourteenth century.  The earliest mention of a Park at Lamer dates to 1589 (information from Anne Rowe).  The manor house is claimed to have been rebuilt by Sir William Garrard around 1555.  Only one drawing of this earlier house survives, but some sources doubt its accuracy. His grandson, Sir John Garrard became the first baronet, and the tombs of all six baronets are in St Helen’s Church, Wheathampstead.

The tomb of the Sir John Garrard, 1st baronet.

The tomb of the Sir John Garrard, 1st baronet.

On the death of sixth Baronet, Sir Benet Garrard (c.1704 to 1767), the baronetcy lapsed and the estate passed to  Charles Drake, who adopted the name Drake Garrard.  They began the remodelling of the the estate replacing the Jacobean house with an elegant Georgian one.  They also employed Nathaniel Richmond to remodel the Park.  When Richmond died, the task fell to Humphrey Repton who created one of his famous “red books”.  According to the Dury and Andrews’ map of 1766, the Park then consisted of a series of avenues of trees as had been the fashion in the late 17th/early 18th century.

Lamer Park from Dury and Andrews' map, as redrawn by Andrew Mcnair.

Lamer Park from Dury and Andrews’ map, as redrawn by Andrew Mcnair.

The remodelling of the Park by Richmond and Repton created a more open “natural” landscape as was the fashion towards the end of the 18th century.  Maps held by Westminster Abbey (1799) and HALS (1827) show the Park as a much more open landscape.  This is also reflected in the tithe map, and an estate map from 1843 held by the Gifford family.

Map of Lamer from 1843.

Map of Lamer from 1843.

The Estate was inherited by Apsley Cherry in 1892 who changed his name to Cherry-Garrard in accordance with the terms of the inheritance.  His only son was the famous arctic explorer, Apsley Cherry-Garrard.

The monument to Apsley Cherry-Garrard in Wheathampstead church.

The monument to Apsley Cherry-Garrard in Wheathampstead church.

Apsley slowly sold off the estates belonging to Lamer, and finally sold the house and Park just after the Second World War.  The house was demolished in 1949 and the Park turned into farmland.

One might ask how geophysics comes into all this?  Many of the buildings in the 1766 and later maps still survive.  On the Dury and Andrews map, however, there is a small building with, perhaps, a wall and garden just to the east of the main buildings.  This building is otherwise unknown.  In June, Mike Smith and I undertook a small GPR survey in the field to the east of the coach house in the hope of locating this building.  We only surveyed one small 40x40m block, so it was a bit of a long shot.  Here are the time slices.

The 7 to 9ns time slice.

The 7 to 9ns time slice.

The 9 to 11ns time slice.

The 9 to 11ns time slice.

The 11 to 13ns time slice.

The 11 to 13ns time slice.

The 13 to 15ns time slice.

The 13 to 15ns time slice.

The 15 to 17ns time slice.

The 15 to 17ns time slice.

The 17 to 19ns time slice.

The 17 to 19ns time slice.

We have, I think, essentially found the remains of three roads.  The road which shows clearly in the SW corner, especially in the 9–11ns time slice, was known.  Angela Gifford remembers this road being built as a child in the early 1950s.  More curious are the other two roads.  The east-west road, that also shows clearly on the 9–11ns time slide, appears to line up with the existing tarmac road.  That road, however, was created relatively recently by David.  Was there an earlier version of it?  There wasn’t, originally, access between the two buildings north and south of the tarmac road.  A plan at HALS shows the gap filled with the a building for the dung from the coach house and stables (to the south of the current road) and the hack stables to the north. The third road is the broad curving line running from the SE corner of the plots to the middle of the northern edge.  This road is unknown to the current inhabitants of Lamer.  Map evidence shows that the road system was changed quite frequently between the late 18th century and now.  This road must have been part of the Park at an earlier date.  In the deeper time slices, e.g., the  15–17ns one, one edge of the road appears as a series of dots.  I think this is just because Mike and I were surveying north-south and the interpolation algorithm has not managed to join them up when the line is at such an acute angle to the line of the transects. There does, however, seem to be “something solid” edging the road on the eastern side.

We didn’t find the house and courtyard, but it was not entirely a bust either.  Perhaps we should do some more!

Dave’s family have been raising money for the Hertfordshire Air Ambulance in his memory. Please donate to this worthy cause if you can.

Record breaking

It was an odd day, weather wise. Largely dry with just one quick, light shower, windy at times, sunny spells… Luckily nothing interfered with the fieldwork!

The res team consisted of myself (when I wasn’t putting in grids for people), Ellen, Tim and Pauline.  They pulled out the stops and managed a record-breaking eight grid squares.  Area-wise, that is what the GPR covers in an average day, but for resistance survey at 0.5m intervals, that is very good going.  Well done everyone.

The resistance survey at the end of day 32.

The resistance survey at the end of day 32.

Today’s grids behaved themselves and make the four odd ones from yesterday stand-out even more.  I did make sure that some of the connectors were off the ground today.  How annoying. We may have to re-do those four grids.  The survey did, however, show the buildings along the road in the SE corner beautifully.  The big question… where now?  North to the sinuous ditch?  South for more shops?  West to cover the cross roads?  Only four days surveying left, and we have to assume that we won’t cover eight squares every day.

The mag team also had a very successful day in the Macellum field.

Detail of the mag survey showing the Macellum field.

Detail of the mag survey showing the Macellum field.

We can just see a hint of the cross-roads running NE-SW across Watling Street.  The ‘1955 ditch’ barely shows.  With the eye of faith one might see it in the high readings along the edge of the cross-road, but very much with the eye of faith.  Is the ditch just so built over we cannot see it?  Or was it never built here?

With just four survey days left to go, the team is getting close to finishing the field, but I think we are a day or two short of being able to do that.

The entire mag survey to date.

The entire mag survey to date.

Way down across the field, the GPR team tackled another fiddly staggered bit along the hedge line.  In the next three images I have made the previous days’ surveys partially transparent.

The day 32 GPR, slice 3 (12.5 to 15.5ns).

The day 32 GPR, slice 3 (12.5 to 15.5ns).

The day 32 GPR, slice 4 (15.5 to 18.5ns).

The day 32 GPR, slice 4 (15.5 to 18.5ns).

The day 32 GPR, slice 35 (18.5 to 21.5ns).

The day 32 GPR, slice 5 (18.5 to 21.5ns).

The curious shallow valley to the west of the surveyed area (‘valley’ seems a strong word for it!) that runs down the hill towards the temple is just as devoid of buildings or other recognizable archaeological features as the mag data.  In all three time slices not a great deal shows.  Was this valley always empty?  Or has the archaeology been eroded away, or even buried?  Difficult to say,  There is, however, a long narrow building just to the right of the middle of the surveyed area almost parallel with the hedgerow.  It seems fairly ephemeral, but it definitely there and one corner was picked-up in last year’s grid to the south.

Although the GPR hasn’t covered as much as the mag, we have still collected a mass of data.

Montage showing the area surveyed with the GPR to date.

Montage showing the area surveyed with the GPR to date.

It certainly takes-up a large chunk of my hard disk.

Many thanks to everyone who came out today and worked so hard.  A very successful day all round.  Our next survey day is on Thursday.