Anyone new to this blog or geophysics in archaeology is recommended to read the material on the “Geophysical survey in archaeology” page.
In this case, two ends: we have just started the final week of the 2018 survey season and the mag team are within two partials of completing as much as we can of Mobbs Hole and moving into the field to the south. First to the mag.
After the annoying plethora of frozen sensors, the mag team spent a good proportion of their day re-doing duff squares. It was worth it, however, as today’s data looks fine (Figure 1).
Although we can be pleased with the area we have covered, surprisingly little apart from the Fosse itself and related features show. We must keep in mind, as Isobel Thompson reminded me this morning, that “even such negative evidence is information”. Negative information may be important, but at the end of a long day’s survey some tasty looking buildings would be nice. Figure 2 shows one possibility, although we may be grasping at straws!
The Earth Resistance survey takes fourth place in priority after surveying in pegs, mag and GPR. Anne and I did, however, manage to extend the main block of res data by another three grids. Figure 3 shows the results.
As you can see, we have picked-up some more of the building to the east, but also part of Street 25 running SW–NE. There is quite a break in the line of the street which is curious. Figure 4 shows the GPR data in this area.
It is useful to note that some parts of the buildings show more clearly in the res data, and some in the GPR thus making the extra effort of doing res as well worth while. The GPR data also shows a break in the road. Figure 5 shows the mag data.
Note how the buildings that show clearly in the res/GPR barely show in the mag data, but how the “burnt building” (assuming my interpretation is correct) only shows in the mag data. Multiple techniques rule, OK? I have roughly marked the line of the aqueduct in Figure 5. Let’s now look at how that maps back onto the res data (Figure 6).
Not only does the aqueduct kink around the two buildings as we noted in an earlier post, but it goes through the break in the road. I guess there could be a wooden bridge (which we would not detect) or maybe a culvert where the roof has collapsed or has been robbed. Fascinating stuff.
The GPR crew in their machine-like fashion completed yet another 80x40m block. Figure 7 shows six time slices.
Most of the action, so to speak, is in the NE corner. There is a particularly clear corner in the fourth time slice indicated with a red arrow (Figure 7, top-right slice). This might be a surviving floor. There also appears to be a long linear negative feature, as shown in the fifth time slice by three red arrows. Figures 8 and 9 show slices 4 and 5 in context with the day 14 data.
Three things caught my eye. The squarish “floor” which crossed over the boundary between the two days data, the sub-circular white “blob” which also lies across the boundary, and the long linear low-reflection feature (shown in white) which runs diagonally SW–NE across the lower half. I traced the square and the blob and had a look at the mag data (Figure 10, click on it to see full-sized).
The white blob corresponds with a faint “blob” of higher readings in the mag data. On its own, I would have been tempted to ignore this, but it does look like a feature about 6m across. The square is harder to assess. There are magnetic features parallel to it and close by. We are probably looking at parts of a building. I had a quick look at the radargrams and the square high-reflectance feature in the GPR data looks like a solid layer, probably a floor. I also noticed the long linear ditch-like feature running across the mag data, so I traced that and went back to the GPR data (Figure 11).
The linear feature in the mag data fits the linear feature in the GPR data perfectly. Lovely result.
It was a busy day surveying today, and so I didn’t have time to goof off and take photos of people or the views. Maybe tomorrow!
Thanks to everyone who helped today.