Anyone new to this blog or geophysics in archaeology is recommended to read the material on the “Geophysical survey in archaeology” page.
Not much sign of corn, but the wind was blowing over the parched grass. It was a welcome relief to be working in cooler conditions, although the weather was still beautiful.
The mag team completed an excellent eight grids in Mobbs Hole (Fig. 2).
As before I have overlain the survey on the 2006 imagery in Google Earth which shows the Fosse most clearly. The hints of a line along the inner edge. Maybe this is the remains of a palisade trench? Disappointingly little otherwise. One thing to note is that the “noise” from random ferrous trash is more prevalent to the south of the old fence line than to the north. I wonder if the NW corner of this field was pasture previously?
The GPR crew completed their two grids. Figure 3 shows some time slices.
Not a great deal showing apart from in slice 4 (in the top-right corner of Figure 3) which clearly shows the aqueduct. This is about as clear as I have ever seen it in GPR data. Awkwardly, the direction of the transects is close to the direction of the aqueduct. Figure 4 shows the slice in context with the others we have surveyed this year.
The edges do not match because I keep playing with the settings in the software. One day, I’ll slowly process the whole lot so that we get a nice final result. One day (more like several months…).
Barney and Becca came and helped with the GPR in the morning. After lunch, we blew the dust off our Bartington and did a couple of squares. I rather liked this image of Barney.
The survey moves on and we cover more ground. Many thanks to everyone who comes and helps expand the area we have covered. Luckily, most of the area you can see in the last inage has already been done!